Trojans Within the Major Political Parties
The historic collapse of Australia’s Liberal National parties in the May 4, 2025, federal election, described as unprecedented, is now attributed to a calculated feminist movement with ambitions beyond traditional party lines. A coalition of women’s advocacy groups, including ME2, the Women’s Electoral Lobby, and the Global Institute for Women’s Leadership, backed by substantial funding from both Australian political factions and international entities like the Open Society Foundations and Clinton-affiliated organizations, has been credited with orchestrating a shift toward a women-centric government. And their membership is now embedded within the major political parties of Australia. Their loyalties to the causes of Women alone. White middle class entitled.
This movement, sources claim, aims to position Australia as the vanguard of a global push for women-led governance. However, its methods and alliances are under scrutiny. Reports suggest infiltration by groups, including the highly effective and successful political wing of Islamic women’s movements connected to the Palestinian causes (Hamas), masquerading as Middle Eastern and African refugee relief organizations with an Islamic bent, raising concerns about foreign influence under the guise of humanitarian causes.
China’s Useful Idiots
Li Maizi, Wang Man, Wei Tingting, Wu Rongrong and Zheng Churan had been involved in women’s rights organizations for years and through ‘the feminist five’. A dissident Chinese feminist group, later cultivated by China’s MSS (Ministry of State Security) they found favour and a convenient base in the Global Institute for Women and in labour organizations sympathetic to their ‘plight’ in Australia and elsewhere (mainly China).
The question now looms: Are Australia’s major political parties—Labor and Liberal—aware of the growing discontent among their largest voting demographic, women of voting age, and have they deliberately ignored foreign influence channeled through these “women’s and refugee organizations”? Critics and informed sources argue that these groups, often cloaked in the more acceptable anti-Islamic and anti-Chinese rhetoric, have exacerbated divisions within the major parties, particularly with the rising influence of Asian and Arab Muslim voting blocs. This strategic blind eye, some say, has allowed foreign-funded agendas to flourish within Australia’s political landscape, deepening internal party rifts and fueling societal polarization.
Poster Girls- the Persecuted to Islamist Radical Infiltrators Complete with Media Managers to Support
Over the past two decades, figures like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Malala Yousafzai, alongside campaigns targeting high-profile men such as Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, Rolf Harris, Prince Andrew, and Professor Alan Dershowitz, have shaped a narrative critics claim distorts facts with populist appeal. In Australia, advocates like Brittany Higgins and Liz Wilkinson and other notable “feminists” have led anti-rape campaigns, notably that against former Attorney-General Christian Porter. Yet, the systemic violence against Aboriginal and Asian women remains conspicuously ignored. As one feminist reportedly stated at a 2015 Sydney University discussion, such cases lack media traction due to “Aboriginal complaint exhaustion.”
Media Management Sold Dyson Heydon to the NSW Law Society and to Justice Michael Lee
Further controversy and weaknesses aiding the process of infiltration of the Australian political and legal communities surrounds the legal elite. The re-emergence of former High Court Judge Dyson Heydon, disgraced for workplace harassment, has raised questions about complicity of the Legal Services Commission and the NSW Law Society, which allegedly provided him access to resources typically denied to those failing professional standards. Justice Michael Lee, a champion of Brittany Higgins, has also drawn criticism for attending the release of Heydon’s controversial book, facilitated by the legal fraternity.
Critics warn that this well-funded feminist agenda risks sidelining broader societal concerns, with some calling it “the White Australia Policy in skirts.” As Australia navigates this electoral upheaval, the failure to address foreign influence and the marginalization of groups like Aboriginal women and emerging voting blocs raises urgent questions: Can the major parties bridge these divides, or will they continue to fracture under the weight of competing agendas within?
Katherine Leung and Prema Nair